GRE作文機考注意事項
爲了幫助大家提前對gre作文機考流程熟悉，能夠儘快適應考場環境，下面小編給大家帶來GRE作文機考注意事項，希望對大家有所幫助!
GRE作文機考注意事項
GRE作文考試的流程
考生首先應熟悉GRE作文考試的流程，一般情況下，考生從到達考場到考試完畢，通常分爲以下六步：
第一、考生查考號，領取櫃子鑰匙和夾着紙的硬板，紙上是所要抄的誓言。聽完監考老師講完注意事項後，就開始抄誓言，寫地址條(考生收信地址，英文格式和郵政編碼)。
第二、把隨身攜帶的所有東西(除了兩個證件之外)都存入櫃子裏。任何食品、飲料、滴眼液等與考試無關的物品都不允許帶入考場。注意：考試過程中是不允許脫衣服的，所以考生要視環境冷熱而行。
第三、監考老師開始檢查考生的證件，發草稿紙(六張)。
第四、老師按號要求考生照相(對着攝像頭)，覈對姓名和地址之類的。然後考生進考場，耳塞都掛在電腦桌的隔板上，兩支鉛筆放在桌上。
第五、開始考試後，首先熟悉鍵盤和鼠標和填寫背景調查(這兩個步驟都可以跳過)，填寫兩個筆考考場。然後寫ISSUE和ARGUMENT。最後填寫送分學校。
第六、到了考場門口把草稿紙還給老師。
注：各個考場可能細節上不太一樣，考生們應視具體情況而定。另外，考生還應注意幾個問題。
注意問題一：必須帶好的證件
准考證號是註冊時候發到郵箱裏面的那封郵件上面的號碼，郵件不用打印出來，只要考試時記着號碼就可以。
參加GRE/GMAT考試的考生要攜帶兩類有效證件，其中至少有一個是第一類證件。第一類證件至少有一種是護照、正式居民身份證或軍官證.第二類證件可以是駕駛證、帶鋼印的工作證(不接受工作卡) 、往來港澳通行證、外國人居留證、港澳居民回鄉證或由正規大專院校頒發的學生證(不含五大：電視大學、夜大學、職業大學、業餘大學、函授大學;其他任何培訓性質的院校或培訓項目頒發任何形式的證書均不接受)。
缺少第二類證件，可到考生本人所在學校學生處、單位人事部門、戶籍所在地派出所、檔案所在人才交流中心、街道辦事處開具身份證明信(戶籍所在地派出所開具的證明信應該是有照片、蓋有戶籍章的格式打印戶籍證明。其他證明信需有本人照片、本人簽字、本人身份證號碼，個人體貌特徵描述和經辦單位人事部門電話，經辦人簽字，並且在照片上蓋有介紹單位的公章)。
按照ETS要求，考場不接受以下證件作爲考試證件：(但不僅限於此)：臨時證件(包括臨時身份證、臨時駕駛執照、臨時工作證等)，過期的證件(包括過期身份證、過期駕駛執照、過期工作證等)，國際駕駛執照，社會保險卡 ，任何信用卡 ，公證函 ，工作卡 ，出入證(卡)。
未按要求出示證件的考生，考場有權拒絕其參加考試。持任何假證件的考生不能參加考試。證件方面如果出現問題(例如身份證遺失)或者出現自己無法確定的情況，請千萬提前打電話到考試中心詢問清楚相關事宜。
另注意，如果發生證件不全情況，考試中心會要求考生儘快拿回證件，但是一天只有2場考試，如果在最後一場考試開始後還沒有帶來，就不能再考試了。最後一場在上午11點到場。
提醒：請各位務必自行確認有效證件，避免出現_放棄考試甚至全盤計劃被打亂，事後再後悔不迭的情況出現!
注意問題二：草稿紙的問題
進入考場之後，工作人員會發給每一個考生兩支鉛筆，六張草稿紙。進去之前一定要數一下確認。六張草稿紙是釘在一起的，不要弄散，出來的時候要還回去，一張也不能少，發現少了會很麻煩。如果考場上不發草稿紙，可以給考點要索取。
注意不要在做問卷的時候寫模板。很多考生在做作文前的問卷調查時就在草稿紙上寫模板了，這是不允許的，會被視作作弊。考生可以適當的寫一些提綱，這樣會在寫作時有清晰的思路。
注意問題三：時間的分配
整個考試總共120分鐘。在最前面在電腦上填寫一些個人信息之類的，以及讓你熟悉界面，是45分鐘。 ISSUE 45分鐘，ARGUEMNT 30分鐘，這樣就是120分鐘。 ISSUE和ARGUMENT兩個部分之間沒有休息時間。
如果之前已經用PP3模擬考過的，最前面那45分鐘的很多內容都可以跳過去。但是跳過去的部分節省的時間不能算到作文裏。一旦選擇結束這個調查和熟悉界面的部分，考試立即開始.，即看到作文題時記時已經開始。所以審題和列提綱的時間都是在45/30分鐘內。
另外，左下角有個倒記時的小鐘，前40分鐘可以點擊它，使左上角的數字倒計時消失。但最後5分鐘無論你願意不願意，左上角的倒計時都會出現。
注意問題四：考試時的界面是TXT
TXT只有複製剪切粘貼的功能，沒有WORD的糾錯功能。雖然平時模考的pp3在windows下執行的時候右鍵仍然可以用(因爲是文本框)，真正考試的時候鼠標的左右鍵是完全一樣的，所以提醒慣用鼠標右鍵進行cut或者paste等操作的考生，平時準備的時候要注意到這一點，實際考試時沒有這種快捷鍵。
注意問題五：免費寄成績的學校的填寫
考試前要想好確定自己要填哪幾所學校，哪個專業。學校的選擇是按國家、州、學校、專業來選的，所以考生只要知道學校的全稱和學校在哪個州。BULLETIN上也有學校代碼。雖然給出的選擇的州名不是全稱，但也不是兩個子母的縮寫，每個人只要知道州名的全稱都可以分辨出來那種形式州名的縮寫。如果實在不確定，可以向監考老師詢問。建議考生選與自己水平適合的中等大學，太好的先別選。
注意問題六：表和耳機
關於用來計時的表，如果你想帶進考場，一定要戴指針的，手機或其它電子計時器是不被允許的。
關於耳機，各個考點所提供的耳機是不同的。建議大家開始就戴上耳機，因爲周圍嘈雜的鍵盤聲和因錯誤操作而產生的不絕於耳的“滴滴”聲可能會影響考生的情緒。
注意問題七：考完之後
筆考准考證(AdmissionTicket)從美國ETS本部寄出，目前沒有明確的數據表明在作文考試幾天之後一定可以拿到准考證。如果在筆考日期之前的2到3個禮拜仍沒有拿到准考證，請立刻與ETS本部聯繫。Email地址爲：。
能否取得高分，不僅取決於你準備的充分與否，而且在於你發揮的如何。如果你已經準備的很完備，適當的注意一下可能會遇到的問題，熟悉一下考試的過程，參考一下經驗，你就會更加得心應手。
GRE寫作滿分範文1
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
This?argument?states?the?problem?but?the?conclusion?is?not?compatible?to?the?rest?of?the?statement.??
Silver?Screen?recognized?that?fewer?people?attended?movies?in?the?studied?year.??I?would?recommend?that?they?find?out?if?this?was?happening?with?the?entire?movie?market.??It?might?of?have?been?a?poor?year?for?movies?for?all?movie?companies.??
Silver?Screen?recognized?that?of?the?movies?that?they?did,?they?received?favorable?reviews.??It?should?be?concluded?that?they?are?doing?well?with?the?movies?that?they?are?making.??Obviously,?they?are?on?track?with?the?consumer?in?what?they?are?producing.??
I?understand?the?conclusion?that?more?people?need?to?be?exposed?to?the?movies?available?for?viewing.??The?last?statement?focuses?on?the?fact?that?advertising?needs?to?be?increased,?but?does?it?by?cutting?production?costs.??This?is?wrong,?instead?of?continuing?what?is?working?the?company?plans?on?focusing?on?advertising?while?taking?away?from?producing.??The?consumers?like?the?movies?they?make.??If?Silver?Screen?focuses?their?funds?with?advertising,?producing?funds?will?suffer.??It?will?not?matter?how?much?advertising?is?done,?if?it?is?a?poorly?produced?movie,?nobody?will?want?to?go???Eventually,?Silver?Screen?will?get?the?reputation?of?producing?bad?movies.??There?has?to?be?some?compromise?which?doesn't?hurt?producing?costs.??
Commentary??
This?response?is?flawed.??It?makes?two?points,?the?first?of?which?is?undeveloped?(paragraph?2)?and?the?second?of?which?(the?remainder?of?the?essay)?is?mainly?discussion?rather?than?analysis,?although?some?meager?analysis?is?present.??The?author?also?offers?a?questionable?assumption?of?his?or?her?own?in stating?in?paragraph?4?that?"the?consumers?like?the?movies?they?make."??Overall,?there?is?nothing?incisive?or?convincing?in?this?paper.??It?is?loosely?organized?and?not?well?developed.??
The?response?is?clear;?what?errors?there?are?never?interfere?with?a?reader's?understanding,?but?there?are?frequent?minor?errors?in?language,?syntax,?and?punctuation.??
For?all?of?these?reasons,?the?response?is?clearly?limited?and?deserves?a?score?of?3.
GRE寫作滿分範文2
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
Americans?are?spending?millions?of?their?hard?earned?dollars?to?see?the?latest?theatrical?productions,?and?we?here?at?Silver?Screen?want?to?exploit?our?share?of?that?profit.??Surveys?have?proven?that?our?movies?are?better?than?ever,?but?yet?our?attendance?is?lower?than?ever.??This?finding?screams?one?shortcoming:??advertisement.??
Try?to?think?of?the?last?movie?you?remember.??The?movie?which?probably?leaps?into?everyone's?mind?is?Independence?Day.??Why???Certainly?not?because?of?the?actual?film,?but?because?of?all?the?'hype'?which?the?movie?received.??Furthermore,?this?grand?production?paid?off?big?for?the?production?company.??
Does?anyone?that?you?know?drive?by?the?theatre?just?to?see?what?is?playing?and?then?pick?a?film?based?on?the?catchiness?of?the?title???No.??Viewers?buy?tickets?for?movies?which?they?have?seen?effectively?advertised?on?television?and?radio.??
Not?only?must?Silver?Screen?advertise?more,?but?we?must?advertise?when?it?really?counts:?Monday?Night?Football,?the?evening?news,?awards?shows,?etc.??
Everyone?has?heard?the?saying,?"you?must?spend?money?to?make?money",?and?it?is?proven?true?in?this?industry.??
From?a?completely?economical?standpoint,?the?ad?is?actually?more?important?than?the?film?itself.??Consumers?are?compelled?by?the?preview?and?buy?a?ticket.??I?am?not?suggesting?that?we?compromise?the?integrity?of?our?films,?but?I?cannot?overstate?the?importance?of?this?decision.
Therefore,?I?submit?that?the?Silver?Screen?Production?Company?attempt?to?secure?30%?of?the?fiscal?budget?for?advertisement.??It?will?be?the?best?money?you?have?ever?spent.??
Commentary??
The?writer?of?this?seriously?flawed?response?has?adopted?the?position?that?she?or?he?works?for?Silver?Screen?and?that?it?is?her?or?his?job?to?present?in?expanded?form?the?fallacious?reasoning?of?the?argument.??In?so?doing,?the?writer?turns?the?argument?task?into?an?issue-like?discussion.??The?writer?presents?no?analysis?of?the?argument.??
The?paper?is?characterized?by?a?series?of?undeveloped?paragraphs,?yet?there?is?some?variety?in?syntax?and?there?is?adequate?control?of?both?language?and?the?elements?of?writing.??However,?even?though?the?writing?may?be?typical?of?a?4?score?level,?the?absence?of?any?kind?of?critique?requires?a?score?of?2.
GRE寫作滿分範文3
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
The?author?make?a?conclusion?that?Silver?Screen?should?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies.??Becase?the?author?think?the?public?is?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?quality?are?available.??Althogh?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviews?actually?increased?during?this?period,?it?is?the?opnion?of?the?movie?reviews?which?not?stand?for?the?reviews?of?the?most?people.??So?these?fact?is?not?sufficient?provide?the?conclusion.??Furthermore?the?author?think?we?need?let?more?prospective?viewer?have?the?same?opnion?of?the?movie?viewer.??It?is?not?unreasonable?that?it?will?decrease?his?inference.??So?I?don't?think?it?is?a?good?conclusion?for?Silver?Screen?to?spend?more?money?on?advertise?instead?of?improve?the?quality?of?movie.??
Commentary???
This?fundamentally?flawed?response?is?characterized?by?three?essential?deficiencies:??
--?It?provides?little?evidence?of?the?ability?to?understand?and?analyze????the?argument.?
--?It?provides?little?evidence?of?the?ability?to?develop?an?organized?response.?
--?It?contains?a?pervasive?pattern?of?errors?in?grammar?and?usage?that results?in?incoherence.??
Where?the?language?makes?sense?and?looks?controlled,?the?writer?has?relied?on?the?language?and?phrasing?of?the?argument?topic.??Where?the?writer?has?relied?on?her?or?his?own?knowledge?and?command?of?language?and?syntax,?we?see?serious?and?fundamental?deficiencies.??Thus,?this?response?requires?a?score?of?1.?
