有關guns的雅思作文怎麼寫

很多同學的英文寫作水平都不錯，但是由於可能對雅思題型掌握不準確，有些素材可能缺乏瞭解，導致雅思作文分數偏低。guns是槍支的意思，許多同學不知道這類話題怎麼寫，下面小編就給大家分享一些參考範文，希望你們喜歡。

雅思大作文解析及範文：警察是否該配槍

mes. However, others think this measure would raise the level of social violence. What is your opinion?

思路解析：

應該配槍:

1. 在一個槍支氾濫的時代，配槍能保護警察自身。

2. 幫助警察迅速的打擊和制止罪犯。

3. 是有效的威懾來預防那些潛在犯罪。

不應該配槍：

1. 槍支可能被濫用。

2. 誤傷羣衆。

3. 被偷被搶怎麼辦。

4. 刺激罪犯進行新一輪的火力採購，形成軍備競賽。

參考範文：

As opposed to the extensive use of weapons in the US, people in the UK, even the police are not allowed to take guns. Some people argue that it may trigger off insecurity of city dwellers, whereas others assert that it can eliminate the whole violence in the society. Hereby, I would like to discuss both perspectives in the following paragraphs.

Some people believe that the absence of carrying guns is disadvantageous in many aspects in any nations. It has been a trend that the violence is increasing in various parts of the world. More and more criminals these days carry guns and other dangerous weapons, but our police force only have pepper spray and batons for protection (as well as bullet proof vests). This is not enough of a deterrent, not enough in today’s society. If the police have proper equipment, such as, carrying a gun, they would hopefully not lose their lives and the residents will feel safer and better protected.

Others, however, hold the opinion that the police should not be allowed to carry guns. There have been plenty of cases that some robbers or thieves who commit crime but do not deserve death were shot down by police. Furthermore, some unqualified and irresponsible policemen may hurt some innocent citizens even to death when they are pursuing some culprits. Additionally, guns of police may often be lost and will touch off an even worse situation. And thus, it will reduce the overall violence in our society by not allowing guns to the police.

In conclusion, both opponents and proponents of such a practice have their respective reasons and justifications. However, as a person always expecting a peaceful life, I personally agree with the latter view. If the guns and some of other weapons would be totally restricted in the modern globe, the serious phenomenon of violence and other relevant behaviors would vanish. Hence, it is my sincere wish that governments of other countries would follow the example of the UK to avoid the whole violence in the world.

(343 words)

　　雅思大作文：警察持槍是否給社會帶來更多暴力

Some people believe that if the police force carries guns, it would encourage a higher level of violence in the society.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In some countries, the police force carries guns to fight against lawbreakers and protect the innocent. However, some people hold the view that it would give rise to a higher level of violence. As far as I am concerned, only when guns are used properly under certain supervision, can they serve to protect citizens.

Undoubtedly, guns are one of the most powerful weapons that the police can use to maintain social security and stability as it is the best deterrent to potential lawbreakers and scare off the would-be criminals. If police force carries guns in the public, there is a possibility that the potential criminals may give up their plans, thus reducing the crime rate. In addition, the police can use guns to protect themselves as police officers are one of the most dangerous jobs in the world. They need to protect themselves when they face criminals who are using weapons.

However, the application of guns can pose potential risks. First of all, it may lead to the abuse of weapons, especially in some western countries where ordinary people have the right to buy guns. Secondly, there is a possibility that the police may hurt innocent citizens accidentally when they pick the wrong targets, which also leads to social chaos. Thirdly, if every police officer caries a gun and walks in the street, people will lack the sense of security and the society will have a horrifying atmosphere.

To conclude, the police can hold guns, but they should be very careful to avoid the abuse of guns. At the same time, the police must be trained strictly before being allowed to carry weapons.

　　2019 年 6 月雅思寫作大作文預測及參考範文：佩槍維護治安

爲大家帶來社會類預測話題，原題是：Police in some countries like England don't carry guns. Some people don't approve of this because they think that police with guns gives them security. Others think that police carrying guns decreases crimes. What is your opinion? Give relevant examples and experiences. 佩槍維護治安。社會類作文話題雅思作文部分涉及比較多，本期小站雅思君提供了參考範文，友情提示，範文並不是唯一的高分模板，僅供模仿和思路指引，建議考生取長補短，切勿照搬照抄。

雅思大作文範文

Unlike most countries, the police in the United Kingdom do not normally carry guns. Some people think it leaves citizens unprotected, while others believe that this practice reduces the overall violence in society. Police having guns however is an issue secondary to criminals having guns. ( 45 words )

Because criminals usually have access to guns, police officers need them in order to control crime. If police in the U.K. are able to go without guns and not have crime getting completely out of control then they have already set a fine example that other countries should follow. The fact that they are able to do this is an indication of their ability to control the flow of guns to the general populace and this makes citizens safer than anything else. To a civilian, taking guns away from criminals is more important than giving them to police. ( 98 words )

For places that are not able to, or are unwilling to control this availability of guns to criminals, police have no choice. Countries with weak or ineffective gun laws, or countries bordering such countries, like Mexico which has strong gun laws, but virtually no way to prevent them from being smuggled over the border from the U.S., need a police force that is not only armed, but is armed better than the criminals. This ‘ domestic arms race ’ is the fate of any country that does not realize that civilians have no need of being armed and should have no access to weapons whatsoever. ( 103 words )

The root of the problem is embarrassingly corrupt governments and ineffective half-measures taken to control the circulation of guns, which allows criminals to easily come into possession of guns. Nations around the world should hope to someday reach the point where their police force can afford not to carry guns and still be effective. ( 54words )

　　雅思高分範文：美國公民擁有槍支的好處與弊端

Unlike most countries， the police in the UnitedKingdom do not normally carry guns. Some peoplethink it leaves the citizens unprotected， while othersbelieve that this practice reduces the overallviolence in society. Discuss both views and use yourown experience and evidence.

Unlike most countries， the police in the UnitedKingdom do not normally carry guns. Some peoplethink it leaves citizens unprotected， while others believe that this practi c e reduces the overallviolence in society. Police having guns however is an issue secondary to criminals having guns. (45words)

結構分析：2+1模式，最後一句爲主題句，明確地表達了自己的觀點。但是，前兩句的問題很嚴重，即照抄了題目。(這可能是我和老外沒有溝通好，在他所寫的所有例文中都出現了類似的情況，大家千萬不要學!!!)

Because criminals usually have access to guns， police officers need them in order tocontrol crime. If police in the U.K. are able to go without guns and not have crime gettingcompletely out of control then they have already set a fine example that other countries shouldfollow. The fact that they are able to do this is an indication of their ability to control the flowof guns to the general populace and this makes citizens safer than anything else. To a civilian，taking guns away from criminals is more important than giving them to police. (98words)

For places that are not able to， or are unwilling to control this availability of guns tocriminals， police have no choice. Countries with weak or ineffective gun laws， or countriesbordering such countries， like Mexico which has strong gun laws， but virtually no way toprevent them from being smuggled over the border from the U.S.， need a police force that isnot only armed， but is armed better than the criminals. This ‘domestic arms race’ is the fateof any country that does not realize that civilians have no need of being armed and should haveno access to weapons whatsoever.(103words)

The root of the problem is embarrassingly corrupt governments and ineffective half-measures taken to control the circulation of guns， which allows criminals to easily come intopossession of guns. Nations around the world should hope to someday reach the point wheretheir police force can afford not to carry guns and still be effective. (54words)

　　雅思寫作：社會問題篇

Some people believe there‘s no place for wild animals in 21st century， so to prevent these wild animals from dieing out them is a waste of resources。 To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

人們認爲21實際沒有動物的地方，所以防止他們滅絕是浪費資源，你同意嗎?

Some people think killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary and some people think it is essential for dairy diet。 To what extent do you agree or disagree?

一些人認爲殺死動物做食物是殘忍和沒必要的，但是很多人認爲動物本質就是食物!你同意嗎?

Some people think that a large amount of time and money spent on the protection of wild animals and others think should be better spent on the human population 。To what extent do you agree or disagree

人們認爲花太多錢在動物身上，這些錢應該被花費在人類自己身上!

Many people believe that zoos should be closed because it is cruel to keep animals locked up 。 moreover， zoo do not have a positive role to play in society

很多人認爲動物園應該被關閉，因爲它殘忍的鎖者動物，而且對社會有沒有任何積極意義

Although it is a freedom to use tobacco while some people think it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs。 To what extent do you agree or disagree? What’s your opinion?

雖然菸草的使用是自由的，但是很多人認爲應當把它歸到其他毒品一類，你多大程度同意?

Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire。 Do you agree or disagree? Why?

很多人認爲應當鼓勵那些到了55歲的高層人員退休，讓位給那些新一代的年輕人，你同意嗎?

Who should be responsible for our old people?

誰該爲我們的老人負責?

Peoplehavedifferentexpectationforjobs。Somepeopleprefertostayinthesamecompany，butothersprefertochangethejobfrequently。Pleaseshowtheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofthesetwoviews。

人們對於工作的期待不同，很多人喜歡在同一個公司工作，有些則總是換工作，說說好處和壞處!

Somecountriesallowwomentojointhearmedforces，whilesomeothersthinksuchasnavy，armydoesn’tsuitforwomen。Doyouagreeordisagree?Useyourownexperienceandreasons。

許多國家允許婦女參加三軍，但是很多人認爲類似與陸軍海軍不適合婦女，你認爲呢?

Mendomosthigh-leveljobs，shouldthegovernmentencourageacertainpercentageofthesejobstobereservedforwomen?

大多數高級職位的工作都是由男性擔任，政府該不該鼓勵給女性預留部分高級職位的工作?

Unlikemostothercountries，thepoliceintheUKdonotcommonlycarryguns。Domepeoplethinkthispracticeleavescitizensunprotected，othersbelieveitcouldreducetheoverallviolenceinthesociety。Discussbothsidesoftheviewandgiveyourownopinion。

警察不配槍是沒有保障還是減少暴力

anEnglishmankilledaburglarwhobrokeintohishouse，hewassetfreeafterjudgment，whatwillhappenifittakesplaceinyourcountryandwhatyouropinion?

有個竊賊入屋子盜竊時候被發現，被屋主發現射殺，在英國該屋主的行爲是合法的，如果這樣的事情發生在你國家，結果如何呢?

Whatarethecausesandsolutionoftheproblemofthescarcityofwaterresource?(Nowtheincreaseddemandoffreshwaterhasbecameaglobalproblem，discussthecausesoftheincreaseddemandandwhatmeasuresshouldgovernmentandindividualdotothisproblem。)

水資源缺乏

Peopleobtainmostoftheirinformationfromnewsreporting，howeversomepeoplethinkthatweshouldnotbelievewhatjournalistsreport。whatisyouropinion?whatqualitiesdoyouthinkajournalistshouldhave?

人們獲得信息是通過新聞，但是人們很多時候不相信新聞報道，你認爲呢?你認爲記者需要什麼能力?

Itisfairtocovercelebritiesprivatelivesinthemassmedia?arefamouspeopletreatedunfairlybythemedia?shouldtheybegivenmoreprivacyoristhepriceoftheirfameaninvasioninto

bsp;theirprivatelives?

大衆媒體報道名人隱私是否公平合理?媒體是否應該公平工整對待名人，是否應該給他們更多隱私?沒有隱私是他們出名的代價嗎?。

Stressisthereasonwhymanypeoplestayoffworkingandgobacktoschool，writeanessaytostatewhatcausethestressandsuggestmeasurestoreduceit。

很多人停止工作回到學校學習!什麼原因造成，給點解決方法減少!

Nowadayssurveillancecamerasarewidelyusedinsupermarketssomethinkthatthisisaviolationofhumanright，whileotherinsistthattheyareforthebenefitofsupermarket!Discuss

一些超市安裝攝像頭，有些人認爲是侵犯人們的權益，有些則認爲有利與超市

nowadaysthetrendoffashionchangesveryrapidly，andgraduallypeoplebecometheslavesofit，somepeoplethinkthatapersonshouldchoosecomfortableclotheswhichheorshelike，regardlessoffashion，doyouagree?

人們應當選擇適應和他們喜歡的衣服，而不是流行的

Somepeopleregardtraditionalclothesasoutofdateandnolongersuitable，butotheradvocatethatweshouldencouragemoreandmorepeopletoweartraditionalclothes，youropinionandreasons?

有些人們認爲傳統衣服已經過時，有些認爲我們應當鼓勵多穿傳統衣服!